Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • European Rubber Journal
  • Plastics News
web
Subscribe
  • Login
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • ITEC
    • Automotive
    • Tire
    • Non-Tire
    • Suppliers
    • Silicone
    • Latex
    • Coronavirus
    • Executive Action
    • Government/Legal
    • Opinion
    • Technical Notebooks
    • International Elastomer Show
    • Women in Tire & Rubber
    • HEXPOL Sponsored Content
    • Goodyear recognized by Lockheed Martin as 'elite supplier'
      EV tire advancements to help secure future
      Lambillotte: Only question on AVs is timing
      CAR official says EV future brighter than autonomous
    • Hankook gains OE fitments on Audi RS Q8
      Angelos Papadimitriou to leave position with Pirelli after six months on job
      Hwa Fong joins Taiwan tire makers' bid for alternative to import duties
      NLRB certifies USW as bargaining unit for Kumho Tire plant in Georgia
    • Russia's Kama Tyres expanding truck, ag tire capacities
      Hankook gains OE fitments on Audi RS Q8
      Hwa Fong joins Taiwan tire makers' bid for alternative to import duties
      NLRB certifies USW as bargaining unit for Kumho Tire plant in Georgia
    • DuPont investing in Liveo line of silicone products
      A change at the top for Stockwell Elastomerics
      Flexan receives FDA registration for Suzhou facility
      63rd Polyurethanes Technical Conference set for fall
    • Phillips Carbon Black expanding capacity at site in India
      DuPont investing in Liveo line of silicone products
      New systems solutions advance the sustainability of automotive weatherseals
      Arburg: 2021 Technology Days in June will run for 6 days
    • DuPont investing in Liveo line of silicone products
      A change at the top for Stockwell Elastomerics
      Flexan receives FDA registration for Suzhou facility
      Coi Rubber adding on to plant in China
    • WCCO task force navigates pandemic, expands communications
      ASTM cancels April meetings as COVID-19 continues impact
      Paycheck Protection Program funding reopens Jan. 15
      Detroit Auto Show canceled; alternative event being planned for September
    • A change at the top for Stockwell Elastomerics
      Angelos Papadimitriou to leave position with Pirelli after six months on job
      Tero Peltomaki named Cimcorp CEO
      Synthomer CEO MacLean to step down by early 2022
    • Hwa Fong joins Taiwan tire makers' bid for alternative to import duties
      NLRB certifies USW as bargaining unit for Kumho Tire plant in Georgia
      Rubber industry associations focus agendas as Democrats take charge
      Mexico gives auto makers more time to meet USMCA rules
    • Editorial: Against a backdrop of turmoil, M&A deals give glimpse of normalcy
      Column: Pandemic looms over everything in life, business in 2020
      Column: Lessons from the 2020 Best Places to Work
      Editorial: Silicone hit hard by pandemic, expected to bounce back
    • Advancements in synchronous drive belt design for industrial and consumer markets
      Effects of multiple repurposed materials for reinforcements of standard rubber compounds
      Impact of peroxide blends on the cure rate and aged properties in HNBR
      Techniques to detect long chain branching in polymers
    • Rubber Division seeks abstracts for 200th Technical Meeting
      WORD panelists say evolution, authenticity keys to success
      IEC keynote: Communication key to logistics
      IEC speaker: Specialized elastomers may reduce spread of life-threatening pathogens
    • WORD panelists say evolution, authenticity keys to success
      New video celebrates women in rubber industry
      ITEC panelists say women can thrive in tire industry
      Rubber Division planning second Women of Rubber event
    • Sponsored By HEXPOL Compounding
      Faster Access to Your Polymer Compounding Experts Around the World
      Sponsored By HEXPOL Compounding
      Take a walk thru a HEXPOL Lab
      Sponsored By HEXPOL Compounding
      HEXPOL offers a unique selection of High Performance Elastomers to match your application requirements
      Sponsored By HEXPOL Compounding
      It’s what you can’t see that makes the Difference at HEXPOL
  • Blogs
    • Products
    • Wacky World of Rubber
    • New Products: Nova thinks outside the box with sealing tech
      New Products: MonTech introduces 1,500 kN lab press
      New products: 3M introduces new durable, pliable medical adhesive
      New Products: Lanxess launches energy-efficient PU elastomer
    • Wacky World of Rubber: How Trelleborg, teens sealed a spot in the world record book
      Wacky World of Rubber: Of chicken and feet, but not chicken feet
      Wacky World of Rubber: Time to go mattress shopping
      Wacky World of Rubber: Because nothing says football like 'frunk' shrimp
  • Newsletters
    • Rubber in Automotive
    • Silicone News
    • Latex News
    • Sign Up for Newsletters
    • Hankook gains OE fitments on Audi RS Q8
      Angelos Papadimitriou to leave position with Pirelli after six months on job
      Hwa Fong joins Taiwan tire makers' bid for alternative to import duties
      NLRB certifies USW as bargaining unit for Kumho Tire plant in Georgia
    • DuPont investing in Liveo line of silicone products
      A change at the top for Stockwell Elastomerics
      Flexan receives FDA registration for Suzhou facility
      Coi Rubber adding on to plant in China
    • Bridgestone bets on guayule as alternative natural rubber source
      Synthomer CEO MacLean to step down by early 2022
      Jack Murphy joins Akron Dispersions
      Synthomer optimistic, raises earnings forecast
  • Multimedia
    • Videos
    • Photo Galleries
  • Directory
  • Resources
    • Classifieds & Mold Mart
    • Sponsored Content
    • White Papers
    • Sponsored By HB Chemical
      The Company Behind the Inventory
      Sponsored By French Oil Mill Machinery
      Process Improvement, Cost Reduction with Custom Press Systems
    • Sponsored By Uncountable Inc.
      Cooper Standard deploys lab informatics platform to synchronize R&D
      Sponsored By Elkem
      LSR Selectâ„¢: A solution to improve your financial impact in molding applications
      Sponsored By HEXPOL Compounding
      Peroxide Cureable Silicone Injection Molding
      Sponsored By HEXPOL Compounding
      Understanding and Selecting Performance Additives for Rubber Compounding
  • Data
  • Events
    • RPN Events
    • RPN Livestreams/Webinars
    • Industry Events
    • Past Events
    • ITEC Library
    • International Silicone Conference Library
    • 2021 Healthcare Elastomers Virtual Edition
      2021 Rubber in Automotive Virtual Edition
      2022 ITEC
  • Advertise
  • DIGITAL EDITION
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Automotive
July 24, 2019 12:34 PM

Why Level 3 automated technology has failed to take hold

Pete Bigelow
Automotive News
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Print
    Audi's Traffic Jam Pilot allows the driver to let the vehicle take control during stop-and-go situations.

    Two summers ago, Audi stood on the precipice of an automated-driving breakthrough. Its redesigned A8 sedans contained a system called Traffic Jam Pilot, which, when active, relieved human drivers of the need to pay attention during the tedium of stop-and-go traffic.

    Trumpeted as a defining moment on the road to full autonomy, the system was the first in production that allowed humans to hand driving responsibility to the car itself for some portion of the journey—so long as a human remained available as a backup. In industry jargon, such a system is classified as Level 3 automation.

    But the milestone arrived with an asterisk.

    Audi equipped the A8 with all the components necessary to make Traffic Jam Pilot work, but it hadn't actually enabled the feature. Activation would come, brand executives theorized at the time, via over-the-air updates as regulatory compliance was ensured market by market.

    Today, Traffic Jam Pilot remains dormant in the U.S., and Audi has no foreseeable plans to activate the system. The future of Level 3 automation for Audi and everyone else remains beset by a morass of regulatory, technical, safety, behavioral, legal and business-related complications.

    Once, Level 3, sometimes called "conditional automation," seemed like a natural step in the evolution of automated technology, a progression beyond today's driver-assist systems in which drivers retain responsibility for vehicle operations and a precursor to self-driving vehicles. But that building-block assumption baked into the Levels of Driving Automation, outlined by SAE International, belied unique challenges.

    On the level

    Not all automated vehicles are created equal. The industry has adopted these 6 levels of driving automation, as outlined by SAE International.

     

    • No driving automation: The human drives. The vehicle may have features such as automatic emergency braking or blind-spot warning, but the human remains in control of the dynamic driving task.
    • Driver assistance: The human drives. The vehicle provides steering or brake/acceleration support, such as lane centering or adaptive cruise control.
    • Partial driving automation: The human is responsible for vehicle operations. The vehicle provides both steering and brake/acceleration support.
    • Conditional automation: The human and robot can exchange responsibility for the driving task. The vehicle can drive itself under limited conditions, but the human must take over on request.
    • High driving automation: The robot does all the driving, but with certain restrictions, such as robotaxis that are limited to operating in a geofenced area.
    • Full driving automation: The robot does all the driving, everywhere, and in all conditions.

    "Some OEMs say they're going to skip Level 3 altogether and do Level 4, while others are still pursuing this possibility," said Christophe Marnat, executive vice president of the electronics and advanced driver-assist systems division at ZF. "I'm not sure how to interpret that. Does that mean they have solutions? … Or is it just research that never comes to fruition? It's questionable."

    'Pushes the boundaries'

    Part of the problem is the delineation of responsibility.

    With Tesla's Autopilot and General Motors' Super Cruise, both Level 2 systems in the market today, that's clear. Regardless of functionality, humans remain responsible for all driving operations. In Level 4 self-driving systems, responsibility is also clear: Human occupants have zero role.

    Consider Level 3 a middle ground, where responsibility can be exchanged between human and machine. When systems are in control, humans are still required in case the system encounters a situation it cannot handle.Those handoffs, and the notion of a human backup, bring forth a series of questions and challenges:

    While a system drives, can a human backup check email or watch a video? How do manufacturers ensure there's no mode confusion? What series of audio, visual and haptic cues should be used to alert a human driver they need to retake control? How long should they be given to do so? How should vehicles monitor the readiness of humans to accept a handoff? What happens if they do not accept that exchange?

    "Level 3 pushes the boundaries on what you expect the human to do, and it makes it difficult to discern 'Am I driving or riding?' on a moment-to-moment basis," said Bryan Reimer, research scientist at the Center for Transportation and Logistics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "If I am a human driver, how do I learn to be a fallback?"

    An early experiment provided unsettling answers.

    In the earliest days of its self-driving car project, Google experimented with systems that involved a handoff. Test drivers immediately over-trusted the technology to the point where, in some cases, they fell asleep behind the wheel. Those findings alarmed engineers, making apparent the hurdles of any systems in which humans remained in the loop. For Google, the implications were clear: It was easier to build a self-driving system from scratch than consider keeping human drivers involved.

    Among traditional auto makers, Ford and Volvo came to similar conclusions and have not pursued development of Level 3 systems. Others see conditional automation as valuable, particularly for traditional car owners who might pay for convenience features, such as Traffic Jam Pilot, that relieve their workload behind the wheel. Honda and Mercedes-Benz plan deployments of Level 3 systems in 2020.

    Implementing Level 3 will necessitate a rethinking of user interfaces already developed for driver-assist systems and a more collaborative approach to sharing the driving task, says Artur Seidel, vice president of the Americas at Elektrobit, a supplier of software products and human-machine interface technology.

    Related Article
    Full autonomy will take time, according to Continental's self-driving chief

    An example: If it starts raining while a Level 3 system is engaged, the system could alert its human backup that conditions are becoming more demanding.

    "Then it starts to rain a little harder, and the car says, 'I think you should take over soon,' and then the next stage is the takeover," Seidel said. "It's a gradual transition, and the more we can make the system predictable without overloading the driver, it serves as a training effect."

    Handover is complex

    He underscored the extent of that complexity.

    "Because of the liability involved in that handover," Seidel says, "there's quite a bit more work to do on Level 3 systems. You end up in a situation where you have to—under all circumstances—handle a safe stop. We're not necessarily there."

    Driver-monitoring systems have emerged as a crucial component of any system involving human drivers. By monitoring hand position on a steering wheel or tracking eye movements with in-cabin cameras, systems can ensure a human is paying attention. But they have limitations.

    "It's one thing to say you're looking out the windshield and another to say your head is in the game," says Chris Van Dan Elzen, vice president of product planning at Veoneer, a software and hardware company that spun off from supplier Autoliv and focuses on driver-assist and automated-driving systems.

    Determining how to measure the cognitive readiness of humans to retake responsibility has been the subject of new research. But there is neither consensus nor regulation on how long drivers should be given to accept a handoff. For Traffic Jam Pilot, Audi had estimated drivers would be ready in 10 seconds. Others believe the time needed is considerably longer.

    "The driver shouldn't need to be reactivated faster than a couple of minutes," Volvo CEO Hakan Samuelsson said in November. "Otherwise, it's a very dangerous system. If you cannot do that, you have a pilot-assist system like you have today, which requires total supervision at all times by the driver."

    If driver-monitoring systems have become necessary to enable Level 3, they also represent something automakers prefer to avoid — cost.

    Dashboard messages alert the driver when the feature is available. The Audi A8 has the Traffic Jam Pilot components, but the feature is not activated in the U.S. because of regulatory and other complications.

    Because auto makers accept liability when their systems are in charge, testing and validation costs will be more expensive, as will be additional hardware on vehicles in the form of computing power and redundancy of actuators. Audi added front-facing lidar as part of its Traffic Jam Pilot package; it remains unclear whether others will follow. Further, it remains unclear whether motorists will value these systems enough to bear the costs.

    'Expensive and limited'

    "That's a ton of stuff that's extremely expensive, and when you think about it, you still need to be aware of what's going on as an end consumer in this system," Marnat says. "It's expensive and limited in terms of usage. Maybe you see some consumer benefit, but there's a trade-off between how much you are willing to pay for it, knowing you are still in the loop."

    Some consumers might be prohibited from using such features. In New York, for example, state law requires drivers to keep their hands on the wheel at all times, a factor in Audi's decision to delay the release of Traffic Jam Pilot.

    As these issues are sorted out, auto makers are rolling out more and more advanced driver-assist features. Many in the industry have latched onto the unofficial term "Level 2 Plus," which conveys the idea that functionality of driver-assist systems is improving. At the same time, auto makers are stopping short of accepting liability associated with Level 3.

    "You feel the industry moving toward this Level 2 Plus or 2 Plus Plus or 2 Plus Plus Plus," Marnat laughs. "What is the point where you stop being Level 2 Plus?"

    Combine consumer acceptance with cost, uncertain regulatory landscapes with the thorny nature of control exchanges and driver monitoring, and Level 3 remains an elusive goal.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Rubber & Plastics News wants to hear from its readers. If you want to express your opinion on a story or issue, email your letter to Editor Bruce Meyer at [email protected].

    SIGN UP FOR NEWSLETTERS
    EMAIL ADDRESS

    Please enter a valid email address.

    Please enter your email address.

    Please verify captcha.

    Please select at least one newsletter to subscribe.

    Get our newsletters

    Staying current is easy with Rubber & Plastics News delivered straight to your inbox, free of charge.

    Subscribe Today

    Subscribe to Rubber & Plastics News to get the best coverage and leading insights in the industry.

    SUBSCRIBE
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter

    MISSION

    To serve companies in the global rubber product industry by delivering news, industry insights, opinions and technical information.

    web
    Contact Us

    2291 Riverfront Pkwy, Suite 1000
    Cuyahoga Falls,
    OH 44221

    Customer Service:
    877-320-1726

    Resources
    • About Us
    • Digital Edition
    • Contact the Staff
    • Advertise
    • Order Reprints
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    • Terms of Service
    • Careers
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Partner Sites
    • Tire Business
    • European Rubber Journal
    • Plastics News
    • Plastics News China
    • Urethanes Technology
    • Automotive News
    • Crain Brands
    Copyright © 1996-2021. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • ITEC
      • Automotive
      • Tire
      • Non-Tire
      • Suppliers
      • Silicone
      • Latex
      • Coronavirus
      • Executive Action
      • Government/Legal
      • Opinion
      • Technical Notebooks
      • International Elastomer Show
      • Women in Tire & Rubber
      • HEXPOL Sponsored Content
    • Blogs
      • Products
      • Wacky World of Rubber
    • Newsletters
      • Rubber in Automotive
      • Silicone News
      • Latex News
      • Sign Up for Newsletters
    • Multimedia
      • Videos
      • Photo Galleries
    • Directory
    • Resources
      • Classifieds & Mold Mart
      • Sponsored Content
      • White Papers
    • Data
    • Events
      • RPN Events
      • RPN Livestreams/Webinars
      • Industry Events
      • Past Events
      • ITEC Library
      • International Silicone Conference Library
    • Advertise
    • DIGITAL EDITION