Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • European Rubber Journal
  • Plastics News
  • Tire Business
Subscribe
  • Login
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Best Places to Work
    • Rubber Division IEC
    • War in Ukraine
    • Automotive
    • Tire
    • Non-Tire
    • Suppliers
    • ITEC
    • Silicone
    • Online Exclusive
    • Latex
    • Technical Notebooks
    • Executive Action
    • Government/Legal
    • Opinion
    • Blogs
    • Sustainability
    • Products
    • Wacky World of Rubber
  • Airless Tires
  • Custom
    • Sponsored Content
    • White Papers
  • Resources
    • Directory
    • Classifieds & Mold Mart
  • Data
  • Events
    • RN Events
    • RN Livestreams/Webinars
    • Industry Events
    • Past Events
    • Rubber News M&A Live
    • Ask the Expert
    • Healthcare Elastomers Conference
    • Rubber In Automotive Conference
    • Women Breaking the Mold Networking Forum
  • Advertise
  • DIGITAL EDITION
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. News
July 19, 2016 02:00 AM

Industry blindsided as CAFE fines jump

Ryan Beene
Automotive news
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Print
    Bloomberg News Service

    WASHINGTON—Auto makers worried about the cost of meeting fuel economy targets are waking up to a startling new reality: The cost of not meeting them is about to get a lot higher.

    Next month, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration will more than double the fine it assesses auto makers that fall short of their annual corporate average fuel economy standards. For many auto makers, that increase could upend the economics of their fuel economy compliance strategies, laid out years ago, and insiders worry that auto makers' exposure to fines for noncompliance will only grow as the CAFE requirements grow tougher each year.

    What's more, NHTSA confirmed that steeper penalties will apply to 2015 model year vehicles for which it has yet to issue compliance reports. That means auto makers at risk of missing their targets still don't know how much more the increased fines may have already cost them.

    The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers blasted what it called a “draconian” increase, saying it will make it harder for auto makers to make progress toward the Obama administration's call for a fleetwide average of 54.5 mpg by the 2025 model year.

    The change also risks upsetting the fragile consensus between auto makers and regulators as both sides dive into the key midterm evaluation of the administration's "national program" of greenhouse gas and fuel economy rules.

    “The most disturbing thing about it is that essentially no notice was given,” said one auto executive with responsibility for fuel economy strategy. “You make your regulatory plans based on a certain set of assumptions. To have it change suddenly without notice and without the ability to respond is really troubling.”

    NHTSA has assessed an average of $20 million in fines industrywide each model year since 2010.

    The latest increase, disclosed in a July 5 Federal Register notice about the rule, was prompted by a law enacted last year directing all federal agencies to update their civil penalties to maintain their effect as a deterrent and keep up with inflation.

    For NHTSA, that meant raising the rate used for calculating CAFE penalties to $14 from $5.50. The $8.50 difference amounts to big bucks because it's applied to each 0.1 mpg that an auto maker falls short of its fuel economy target and then multiplied by the number of vehicles from that fleet sold in a given model year.

    "This is a badly needed reform," said Roland Hwang, transportation director at the Natural Resources Defense Council, who said the $5.50 rate made it cheaper for auto makers to miss the target than to try to achieve it.

    The fines are assessed to auto makers that don't make up for their shortfalls by buying offsetting credits, which are privately traded among auto makers. Those credits could become more expensive now, the alliance warned.

    Even before learning of the higher penalties, auto makers were unnerved about the potential for increased exposure to fines.

    On June 20, the alliance and the Association of Global Automakers petitioned the EPA and NHTSA to iron out discrepancies between the greenhouse gas and fuel economy programs that auto groups say complicate the goal of creating one set of national standards for auto makers.

    "Some manufacturers are projecting that, despite being able to comply with the numerically more stringent greenhouse gas standards, they are likely to be in a position to pay CAFE fines," the auto groups said in the petition.

    In a statement, a NHTSA spokesman said “auto makers are already proving they can meet the administration's fuel efficiency and (greenhouse gas) reduction standards,” adding that the multiyear program gives auto makers time and “regulatory certainty” to plan for compliance.

    Related Articles
    Speaker sees opportunity in new CAFE rules
    CFA: Auto makers show spotty success for CAFE goals
    Q&A GM exec lauds strides in supplier relationships
    Bridgestone petitions for inconsequential noncompliance
    Cooper's request for inconsequential noncompliance granted
    NHTSA grants Continental's petition
    54.5 mpg target is off the table, U.S. regulators say
    U.S. to improve fuel standards for heavy-duty vehicles
    NHTSA: Traffic fatalities rise sharply in 2015
    Survey says suppliers value fuel economy standards
    EPA: Auto makers reach record average fuel economy
    EPA's CO2 ruling puts auto industry in a bind
    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Rubber News wants to hear from its readers. If you want to express your opinion on a story or issue, email your letter to Editor Bruce Meyer at [email protected].

    Most Popular
    1
    Bolder, Liberty Tire collaboration sets stage for more circular industry
    2
    GM, Stellantis give $15 million lifeline to insolvent supplier
    3
    Panel at ARPM summit stresses cultivating culture of safety
    4
    Smithers: 4 trends changing, challenging automotive
    5
    EV owners: OE tires falling drastically short of treadwear expectations
    SIGN UP FOR NEWSLETTERS
    EMAIL ADDRESS

    Please enter a valid email address.

    Please enter your email address.

    Please verify captcha.

    Please select at least one newsletter to subscribe.

    Get our newsletters

    Staying current is easy with Rubber News delivered straight to your inbox, free of charge.

    Subscribe Today

    Subscribe to Rubber News to get the best coverage and leading insights in the industry.

    SUBSCRIBE
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter

    MISSION

    To serve companies in the global rubber product industry by delivering news, industry insights, opinions and technical information.

    Contact Us

    2291 Riverfront Pkwy, Suite 1000
    Cuyahoga Falls,
    OH 44221

    Customer Service:
    877-320-1726

    Resources
    • About Us
    • Digital Edition
    • Staff
    • Advertise
    • Order Reprints
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    • Terms of Service
    • Careers
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Partner Sites
    • Tire Business
    • European Rubber Journal
    • Plastics News
    • Urethanes Technology
    • Automotive News
    • Crain Brands
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Best Places to Work
      • Rubber Division IEC
      • War in Ukraine
      • Automotive
      • Tire
      • Non-Tire
      • Suppliers
      • ITEC
      • Silicone
      • Online Exclusive
      • Latex
      • Technical Notebooks
      • Executive Action
      • Government/Legal
      • Opinion
      • Blogs
        • Products
        • Wacky World of Rubber
      • Sustainability
    • Airless Tires
    • Custom
      • Sponsored Content
      • White Papers
    • Resources
      • Directory
      • Classifieds & Mold Mart
    • Data
    • Events
      • RN Events
        • Healthcare Elastomers Conference
        • Rubber In Automotive Conference
        • Women Breaking the Mold Networking Forum
      • RN Livestreams/Webinars
      • Industry Events
      • Past Events
      • Rubber News M&A Live
      • Ask the Expert
    • Advertise
    • DIGITAL EDITION