Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • European Rubber Journal
  • Plastics News
  • Tire Business
Subscribe
  • Login
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Rubber Division IEC
    • War in Ukraine
    • Automotive
    • Tire
    • Non-Tire
    • Suppliers
    • ITEC
    • Silicone
    • Online Exclusive
    • Latex
    • Technical Notebooks
    • Executive Action
    • Government/Legal
    • Opinion
    • Blogs
    • Sustainability
    • Products
    • Wacky World of Rubber
  • Airless Tires
  • Custom
    • Sponsored Content
    • White Papers
  • Resources
    • Directory
    • Classifieds & Mold Mart
  • Data
  • Events
    • RN Events
    • RN Livestreams/Webinars
    • Industry Events
    • Past Events
    • Rubber News M&A Live
    • Ask the Expert
    • Healthcare Elastomers Conference
    • Rubber In Automotive Conference
    • Women Breaking the Mold Networking Forum
  • Advertise
  • DIGITAL EDITION
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. News
November 06, 2013 01:00 AM

Cooper's Armes: It was clear Apollo wanted price reduction

Miles Moore
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Print
    Cooper Chairman, CEO and President Roy Armes.

    WILMINGTON, Del.—Two top Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. executives testified on the first day of a three-day trial in Delaware Chancery Court on Cooper's motion to force Apollo Tyres Ltd. to consummate its proposed $2.5 billion merger with Cooper.

    Cooper filed suit Oct. 4 after Apollo sought to reduce its per-share offer for Cooper's outstanding shares by $2.50, to $32.50 from $35.

    Among the issues brought up during testimony Nov. 5 was whether Apollo requested the per-share reduction after overestimating the cost of an agreement with the United Steelworkers union. Other issues included whether Cooper overestimated to Apollo its earnings outlook, and also whether Cooper underrepresented to Apollo the chances of trouble from Chengsan Group Co. Ltd., Cooper's joint-venture partner in China.

    Cooper CEO Roy V. Armes testified about a Sept. 25, 2013, telephone conversation with Apollo's vice chairman, whom he said estimated the cost of a deal with the USW at $75 million-$125 million.

    "It was clear he wanted a price reduction," Armes said. "I could not negotiate an agreement, then turn around and ask my shareholders to pay for it."

    Armes said he thought Apollo's estimates for a union deal were "pretty high." Later in his testimony, he said he knew this because Cooper recently had settled a dispute with the USW for considerably less.

    Bradley Hughes, Cooper's chief financial officer, said in his testimony that Cooper's second-quarter 2013 earnings turned out to be less than originally projected. Cooper and Apollo announced the merger June 12, shortly before Cooper released its final second-quarter figures.

    Hughes quoted one of his former supervisors at Ford Motor Co.: "The one thing you know is that the forecast is going to be wrong."

    Hughes blamed short-term issues with the startup of Cooper's new Enterprise Resource Policy system for the shortfall, as well as pricing issues, the tire industry's competitive environment and costs associated with the merger. But he also claimed that Cooper gave Apollo sufficient notice of these problems.

    "I'm surprised they were surprised," he said.

    In their questioning of Hughes, Apollo attorneys quoted Cooper documents telling Apollo that acquiring Cooper was "a low-risk way of Apollo entering the Chinese market."

    Instead, according to court documents, union workers at Chengshan (Shandong) Tire Co. Ltd. (CCT), encouraged by management, went on strike June 21. Chengshan Group, according to Cooper, wanted to place its own bid on Cooper.

    Although Cooper owns 65 percent of CCT, CCT no longer manufactures Cooper-brand tires, according to Hughes. Cooper executives also are barred from the CCT plant, except for Chief Technology Officer Kurt Reid and perhaps a few others, he said.

    Cooper's executive committee also has approved a policy of not paying suppliers for future shipments to CCT, according to Hughes. "We thought that might encourage them to be more cooperative," he said.

    The trial was slated to continue through Nov. 7. An attorney representing Apollo said Judge Sam Glasscock III might issue a bench verdict at the end of the trial, but that was unlikely regarding the volume of evidence.

    Related Articles
    Cooper shareholders approve Apollo offer
    Cooper claims Apollo wants to cut offer
    Cooper executive talks technology changes: Yurkovich says industry needs to evo…
    Court to hear Cooper's case against Apollo on Nov. 5
    Labor deal could pave way for Cooper-Apollo merger
    Cooper introduces premium off-road tire
    Apollo 'pleased' with judge's ruling in case against Cooper
    Cooper appeals decision of Delaware court in Apollo lawsuit
    Apollo reports double-digit growth in operating, net income
    Cooper tells SEC third-quarter financial results will be late
    Apollo lands first punch vs. Cooper
    Production set to resume at Cooper Chinese JV plant
    Cooper evaluating upgrade in Miss. plant
    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Rubber News wants to hear from its readers. If you want to express your opinion on a story or issue, email your letter to Editor Bruce Meyer at [email protected].

    Most Popular
    1
    No alternative in sight: Why Michelin is emphasizing sustainability of hevea
    2
    ASTM's new rCB standard intended to ensure quality
    3
    Michelin's hydrogen partners: 4 things to know about Symbio's stakeholders
    4
    Synthos to resume butadiene rubber production at German plant in March
    5
    Is worst of new-vehicle inventory shortage in rearview mirror?
    SIGN UP FOR NEWSLETTERS
    EMAIL ADDRESS

    Please enter a valid email address.

    Please enter your email address.

    Please verify captcha.

    Please select at least one newsletter to subscribe.

    Get our newsletters

    Staying current is easy with Rubber News delivered straight to your inbox, free of charge.

    Subscribe Today

    Subscribe to Rubber News to get the best coverage and leading insights in the industry.

    SUBSCRIBE
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Twitter

    MISSION

    To serve companies in the global rubber product industry by delivering news, industry insights, opinions and technical information.

    Contact Us

    2291 Riverfront Pkwy, Suite 1000
    Cuyahoga Falls,
    OH 44221

    Customer Service:
    877-320-1726

    Resources
    • About Us
    • Digital Edition
    • Staff
    • Advertise
    • Order Reprints
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    • Terms of Service
    • Careers
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Partner Sites
    • Tire Business
    • European Rubber Journal
    • Plastics News
    • Urethanes Technology
    • Automotive News
    • Crain Brands
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Rubber Division IEC
      • War in Ukraine
      • Automotive
      • Tire
      • Non-Tire
      • Suppliers
      • ITEC
      • Silicone
      • Online Exclusive
      • Latex
      • Technical Notebooks
      • Executive Action
      • Government/Legal
      • Opinion
      • Blogs
        • Products
        • Wacky World of Rubber
      • Sustainability
    • Airless Tires
    • Custom
      • Sponsored Content
      • White Papers
    • Resources
      • Directory
      • Classifieds & Mold Mart
    • Data
    • Events
      • RN Events
        • Healthcare Elastomers Conference
        • Rubber In Automotive Conference
        • Women Breaking the Mold Networking Forum
      • RN Livestreams/Webinars
      • Industry Events
      • Past Events
      • Rubber News M&A Live
      • Ask the Expert
    • Advertise
    • DIGITAL EDITION